News and Opinions – Blog Chow

The article headline reads: ‘Stone Advocates Oral Sex’. But when you read the short article you find out just how twisted Sharon Stone appears to be. The fact she advocates oral sex is nice to know. If I’m ever alone and naked with Sharon Stone I’ll know what to do – in case I couldn’t figure it out on my own.

Here’s what she had to say:

“I was in the store the other day and I watched a young girl trying on clothes, showing her abdomen. Her mother was trying to talk to her about not being inappropriately luring. I said, ‘Gee that would look much nicer with a camisole under.’ “Her mother walked away, and I said to the girl, ‘I’d like to give you a two-minute conversation about sex.’ “Young people talk to me about what to do if they’re being pressed for sex. I tell them (what I believe): oral sex is a hundred times safer than vaginal or anal sex. “If you’re in a situation where you cannot get out of sex, offer a blow job. I’m not embarrassed to tell them.”

What do you think about an adult walking up to your child with a pocket full of condoms and talking about various sex acts. This is really bizarre. I’m not sure what she is saying when she says: “if you are in a position where you cannot get out of sex.” What is that about? Is she talking about rape? Or are her morals so low that she is recommending kids just giving in to someone who is persistent. The whole thing is so odd.

There seems to be a trend of adult women going after children recently. There have been numerous cases where child rapists were let off basically scott-free. It seems raping a child is, in many cases, about the equivilent of a traffic violation. There’s about 75 examples posted at worldnetdaily.com. What kind of society do we live in where we don’t protect the children?

Perhaps Sharon Stone figures that this kind of thing has become trendy. Hollywood loves keeping up with and setting trends. She should probably be thrown in jail for approaching young kids in such a manner. Sadly, being a pervert is probably a good career move in Hollywood.

This thing gets sadder and more ridiculous by the day. There were four peace activist Christian cult members who basically blame America and Britain for the all the terrorist’s actions. One of their members ended up being tortured and murdered by the terrorists. Now, Coalition soldiers risk their lives to save the remaining three, and they are still blaming America and Britain for the violence. This is really twisted. Where is the gratitude? They gladly accepted the rescue. They didn’t refuse it.

These members are a part of a cult. What is a religious cult? Well, most are based on taking just a handful of scriptures and ignoring the rest. This is how people get sucked in, because it is based on some fact, and then perverted to obtain the various objectives of the leaders. I don’t know if these members are leaders of the cult or mindless sheep who are unable to find out for themselves the real truth. You can generally tell who is a member of a false religion by the fact that they will repeat the same scriptures over and over again. They take them out of context and ignore all the other scriptures, which bring the truth into focus.

I’m not going to preach to you. I don’t have all the answers. I can’t convince you the Bible is true. But I can say with certainty that the Bible does not advocate laying down arms to murderers. That is a complete twisting of what the Bible says. How many books do you know of that you can you take a verse out of it and that’s all you need to understand that book?

Why are we sending troops in to save people who willingly put their lives in danger and side with the enemy? Of all the demands on the military, why are they being sent in for this? We are supposed to be fighting for freedom, not for those who aid the terrorists. These cult members should probably be thrown in prison for sedition. Under Bill Clinton and Janet Reno, about 80 cult members, including women and children were murdered by our own government. Remember Waco? They didn’t even free the children. That was considered okay, but fighting the terrorists is considered abuse of authority.

Where is the anger from these activists for the murder and torture of their friend? Can you be a human being and not be angry when a comrad or loved one is murdered? Let me guess – they forgive the murderers. Do the terrorists seek forgiveness? How can you forgive the murderers and not forgive those who save you?

They gave the terrorists the “understanding” they felt they were lacking. What they got in return was the murder of one of their members and torture. They proved why we need to fight these animals, yet they didn’t learn anything from the experience.

I used to like to scan headlines to see what’s going on in the world. You can’t do that anymore if you want to be even remotely informed. If you scanned the headlines you might only know that a peace activist was “found dead.” You might only know that the remaining “aid members” were “freed.” This is what some of the major headlines have said. You have to read the fine print to know about the murder and torture committed by the terrorists – about being freed from their captors by the people they blame.

I think you can get a fairly large group of people to protest just about anything, whether it is a legitimate cause or something ridiculous. You can get a million people to a free concert where you can’t get close enough to even know if it is live or memorex. We like events, festivals and gatherings in general.

When it comes to protestors, I think a lot of times it’s just lonely people wanting a place to fit in. They want to feel like they are making a difference. Many have no knowledge of the issues. They don’t gather information on what’s going on in the world. They can easily and naively be convinced something is a good cause, even when it is not. In some cases, people hear about Vietnam and try to relive a different time, even though there is little in common with Vietnam. You know that some of the same people show up at all the various types of protests. They are like Grateful Dead “Deadheads.” It’s a lifestyle or community as much as anything.

There has been an incredible amount of anti-war propoganda from the media. We have liberals who can’t get enough face time to scream out their insane outdated thoughts. You have ongoing well funded organized efforts to draw crowds of protestors. They bus people into various places to fill out the crowds. There is certainly no spontanaety in any of these things. The media runs stories saying “tens of thousands of people plan to protest.” They show narrow shots of the protestors which gives the illusion there is a larger crowd than there actually is. No matter how small the protest, someone is usually allowed free airtime to regurgitate the same worn out one-liners. Do abortion protestors get the same treatment?

So when all these things are brought together with the 3 year anniversary of the war in Iraq, where are all the protestors?

“There’s just about more policemen here than people. I guess the longer the war goes on, the more people accept it.”
– Susan Westergard, Democratic candidate for Utah House of Representatives

“It’s very disappointing, especially in Washington, D.C. You think this is the place where people come to make things happen. I’m just not sure why there aren’t more people here today.”
– Debbie Boch, restaurant manager/protestor

The truth is, this is nothing new. It is only a very small percentage of people who believe in this kind of thing enough to protest. Even the die-hards know that liberals throw a pretty lame party. Polls waver greatly on small developments in Iraq, which proves that many people really don’t have a firm opinion one way or the other. People have lives and don’t have time to get all the necessary information on every issue. That’s why we elect people who do that for a living. That is why we need honest decent people who will do the hard work to get things right.

The people who organize and attend the “pro-America” and “Support the Troops” rallies are mostly conservatives. They tend to draw much larger crowds than these hyped up protests. They are rallies who’s themes tend to be about defending freedom. Pro-war, if you want to call it that. These are uplifting, as opposed to the doom and gloom views of the extreme left.

To sum it up, I think it’s mostly just media hype. They want to convince people to join the “growing anti-war movement.” It’s more like a bowel movement, if you ask me. They want you to feel like you are in the minority for not joining in. The media and liberals are trying to create momentum in the direction of their own worn out views. Objectivity is not part of the picture. They attempt to sway opinion through deceptive measures such as misleading polls. They use the same old punch lines, but don’t offer facts to support them. I believe if they were confident in their own views, they wouldn’t have to trick people to join in with them.

Food For Thought:

I don’t believe this is even a war anymore. I think the “war” has been over for some time. It is a lack of education on what a war is that even allows the mindset to call this a war. The number of people we have lost in 3 years is a day in a lot of wars – an hour in some. That is why “war is hell.” People who think we are losing a war in Iraq are really admitting they know nothing about history. This is more of a police action than a war. It is a dangerous place and there are frequent terrorist attacks. They are setting up a government. This is never easy. It didn’t happen overnight here. Innocent people still die in this country by various means everyday. We have to look at things from a perspective of reality, not fantasy.

George Clooney offered some more absurd comments at the Oscars. Trying to justify Hollywood’s unpopular political stances, he pointed to what he considered to be two historical accomplishments of the awards show.

“We’re the ones who talked about AIDS when it was just being whispered.” “This academy – this group of people – gave Hattie McDaniel an Oscar in 1939 when blacks were still sitting in the backs of theaters. I’m proud to be a part of this academy, proud to be part of this community, and proud to be out of touch.”

First of all, Gone With The Wind still ranks as the most popular movie of all time as adjusted for inflation. That’s not even adjusted for population! People were in love with the movie and the awards were “earned.” It wasn’t awarded because of sexual orientation or for taking a pro-terrorist/anti-Semitic stance. Giving awards or nominations based on sexual orientation is a joke. To give them to movies that portray terrorists in a favorable light is just sick.

What is the record of the ‘Academy’ for African-Americans since then? It’s not one to be proud of – not unless you want to add “racist” to the list of things you are proud to be called.

The other accomplishment Clooney mentioned was bringing up awareness of AIDS. I think people would have figured out on their own about an epidemic that was killing millions of people. Maybe they led the charge because it was more prevalent in Hollywood at the time than it was mainstream America. It was an epidemic in prisons, the gay community and then Hollywood. You don’t have to like that, but let’s be honest here. Nobody listened to the first two groups because they didn’t have the free airtime that the Hollywood elites have. I think the motives in regards to AIDS was more selfish than anything.

Why don’t you speak out on the epidemic of terrorism in the world instead of being sympathetic to it? Just more hypocrisy. Then there is Iraq. You want to save the Iraqi people from “freedom” and give them back to monsters like Saddam Hussein. That’s very kind of you. I wonder if you would have been so kind if you lived in the days of slavery?

Even if we could somehow justify giving Hollywood and the “Academy” credit for those two examples, you can’t be wrong all the time, can you? How often do you have to be on the wrong side and out of touch with Americans to realize you have a piss poor record?

It used to mean something to be nominated or win an Academy award. But this isn’t your parent’s Academy. The Academy/Hollywood Clooney tried to associate himself with back in 1939 was a Conservative, pro-American one. Not a liberal, cut America down propoganda factory that it has become. There was a time in Hollywood when they made pro-America films. Films that portrayed our military and troops in the favorable light that they deserved. Films people liked and went out to see.

What Clooney is trying to take credit for is something that was done by the kind of people that Clooney hates. And did giving an award to a black American end racism? A whole lot of bad things happened after that. Just what is it you want credit for? Here’s one for you George: The conservative party that you hate so much has actually done more than hand out an award. Can you say Abe Lincoln? Can you say abolish slavery? I knew that you couldn’t. I think the America that you seem so ashamed of has been on the right side of history more than a couple times. They have sacrificed more than movie attendance to be on the right side. Thank God your views are “out of touch.”

I really think Clooney is a troubled individual. He’s 44 going on 13. He seems to desperately need attention. I’m not talking about publicity. I’m talking about attention. Almost juvenile attention. Like a teenager who needs acceptance and does strange things to try to get it. He wants to be loved by the clique. Like many in Hollywood, he seems to thumb his nose at the “establishment” to get some adulation from his peers.

There’s been a lot of proof through the years that fame and fortune doesn’t always buy happiness. I think Clooney is an example of that. It’s amusing to me that he’s dated half the women in Hollywood, but can’t find one he likes. “Not that there’s anything wrong with it.” Maybe he should have been in ‘Brokeback Mountain.’ People might have “actually gone” to the theater to see that one.

The good thing from this year’s Academy Awards is that more people than ever know the true motives of Hollywood. Ratings for the Oscars were down yet again, 8% from last year and the 3rd lowest rated Oscars in the last 20 years. That’s reason for freedom lovers all over the world to celebrate.

The biggest motive by the liberals in Hollywood is an outdated political agenda. One that leans heavily on the anti-American side. Most people used to think that it was just a little too much violence and sex in Hollywood. Now we know that it is a desperate attempt to undermine the core values of America. I mean, 3 movies and 15 nominations because of gay or transgender characters is, well, overplaying their hand. Despite all the free publicity, these movies were hardly box office smashes. I think this in your face approach only alienates most people.

Hollywood and the major awards shows promote and glorify violence and deviant behavior. It’s the promoting and glorifying that makes all the difference. That’s not entertainment. They reward the rewriting of history and side with murderers and anti-Semites. Attempting to gently indoctrinate the naive into a world where reality does not exist. Not on the movie screen or off.

Food For Thought:

‘The Passion of the Christ’ has earned $370,782,930. Almost 5 times ‘Brokeback Mountain.’ ‘The Passion’ received a lot of bad media attention about it being anti-Semitic. Of course there was no basis for that, unless you also call the Bible anti-Semitic. Just the good ole media not letting facts get in the way of a good story.

‘Brokeback’ finished in 26th place for the year and ‘Crash’ finished 49th. Combined earnings of ‘Brokeback’ and ‘Crash’ equal 132,501,817 and would still rank it behind #14 ‘Chicken Little’ at $134,838,088. Chicken Little! If you factor in the fact that Brokeback got about a billion dollars in free publicity, not to mention the various other bogus awards it received – it’s really a pretty sad showing. With that kind of advertising you could fill the theaters with a movie about a couple of gay horses. “Bareback Stable?” But anyway… The facts just don’t mesh with the publicity. Not even close.