Archive for February, 2009

New Jerry Seinfeld Television Show

Friday, February 27th, 2009

Jerry Seinfeld is the executive producer and creator of a new television series called ‘The Marriage Ref’ to be aired by NBC. Celebrities, comedians and athletes will give comedic advice to fighting couples. The details aren’t real clear yet. While it may not sound too exciting on the surface, Jerry Seinfeld has a pretty good record. His other show ‘Seinfeld,’ the “show about nothing” is widely accepted as the best television series of all-time.

The show sounds a little like another show on cable called ‘World’s Dumbest’ or something like that, in which people like Danny Bonaduce and Leif Garrett make comments about botched robberies and such. You can be sure the celebrity guest list for ‘The Marriage Ref’ will be entertaining with Jerry Seinfeld behind the show. It will likely have a little more depth than the ‘World’s Dumbest’ show. Its kinda funny – the man behind he greatest TV show is doing a show with a similar premise to the ‘World’s Dumbest’ TV show. There’s some irony in there.

The show doesn’t start until the fall and it currently has six episodes on order for NBC. Reminds me of ‘Jerry,’ the pilot television show on ‘Seinfeld’ that was a spoof of the real show. This one is iffy, as was a show about nothing. If you really want a surefire hit just put out a show based on the characters of George Costanza or Cosmo Kramer. Guaranteed winners. I think maybe Jerry Seinfeld has been afraid they would be a little too successful.

Americans Quickly Losing Faith in Barack Obama – His Mouth is Bigger Than His Ideas

Wednesday, February 25th, 2009

Barack Obama tried hard to regain the faith he has lost with the American people in his address to Congress. He has lost a lot of luster in the past month. His job approval rating is down 10% after one month. U.S. consumer confidence hit an all-time low of 25 this month under Mr. Obama. Consumer confidence was over 60 under George W. Bush just this past September. 

Then came the economic crisis, much of which was preventable. Fifteen Republicans on the Senate Banking Committee tried to address the problem, but liberals led by Barney Frank blew it off. Add to that the part played by those such as Chuck Schumer and ACORN and you can start to see that Obama, by association is in the middle of the original problem. He has rewarded some of those responsible for it all after gaining power by pointing the blame at the outgoing President. Now he is using the crisis as a power grab.

Obama continues to point the finger at George W. Bush and play the victim that inherited the mess, all the while ignoring the events that actually brought on the crisis in the first place. Constantly talking down the economy has been a self-fulfilling prophecy. Many businesses started to lay people off in anticipation of an economic collapse. Remember when unemployment was a forgotten word when George W. Bush was in office? They pushed illegal immigration by saying illegal immigrants had to do the jobs Americans wouldn’t do.

The markets have reacted poorly to Obama’s approach to the economic crisis. Huge bailouts and additional spending doesn’t sit well with investors. One thing you don’t see is Barack and his cohorts letting the free markets do their thing. Big government is the solution, despite the fact that big government caused the problems in the first place. Its not the approach Ronald Reagan used when he inherited a worse mess from Jimmy Carter than this administration inherited.

The enormous spending in the so-called stimulus bill was a breach of trust right out of the box by Barack Obama. His sending 17,000 troops to Afghanistan after being the anti-war candidate doesn’t sit well with the people of that movement. He has now added to that problem by proclaiming that American troops will be finished in Iraq by August of 2010. That’s a ways off. What did we need Obama for? George W. Bush would have probably brought the troops home by then – with honor and victorious.

We have a President who is clearly over his head. His mouth is bigger than his ideas. A lot of people are waking up to Barack Obama’s talking out of both sides of his mouth, as well as his anti-capitalism, big government approach. Of course the media is slow to notice all this. So with their cover the new President can do a lot of damage, in addition to all his hypocrisy.


Get the News that Matters at eNewsAlerts.com

No War for Opium! – Anti-War Barack Obama Orders 17,000 Troops to Afghanistan

Tuesday, February 17th, 2009

I guess Barack Obama must have misplaced the magic wand that was going to eliminate the need to send American troops to war. While we are still engaged in Iraq he is sending an additional 17,000 Americans into war in Afghanistan. Oh, the hypocrisy! Less than a month into his Presidency! Where are all the anti-war people now? The anti-war people said George W. Bush was in Iraq to steal the oil. Is Barack Obama in Afghanistan to steal the opium? It would be a lot easier to ship the opium than it would be a billion gallons of oil. One truckload should take care of the already dazed politicians in Washington.

Barack Obama probably feels going into Afghanistan is a way of making it look like he is willing to fight terrorists without the risk of losing lives as in Iraq. Historically speaking this is no playground in Afghanistan. The Russians and Brits can attest to that. Perhaps it is a token mission and they won’t be fully engaged over there.

Ironically, the only way to know if they are really engaged over there is if there are a large number of casualties. You just can’t battle these guys over there in that region without losing a lot of lives. Maybe Obama is sending them over there on R&R leave from Iraq and they will be lounging around blissfully in the poppy fields. Who knows? One thing we do know is that the anti-war Barack Obama is sending American soldiers into harms way.


Get the News that Matters at eNewsAlerts.com

Barack Obama Busy ‘Porking’ America While 2 Jet Planes Crash in Less Than a Month

Friday, February 13th, 2009

Have the friendly skies become unsafe to travel under Barack Obama? A 2nd jet plane has crashed in under month, meanwhile Barack Obama has been busy with his fellow government turncoats who are pushing the porkulus bill on Americans.

The plane that crashed near Buffalo was new with a clean flying record. Was this an act of terrorism? To add to the mystery, the widow of a 9/11 victim was aboard the plane. We may never know if it was an act of terror, since Barack Obama’s Administration seems incapable of accepting such a defeat. There is no doubt in my mind that, if it be possible, it will be covered it up. One of the main concerns with Obama was National Security during the election. The other concern was that he might push America in a socialist direction. The porkulus bill has proven the latter true in a big way already. What is Obama doing to make air travel safer?

Could you imagine if such events happened under George W. Bush? The porkulus bill porking of Americans and two planes crashing and Barack has been President less than a month. The first plane went down while Obama was busy preparing the most expensive inauguration in history. You could let him off on a technicality, but he certainly had better things to prepare for than the priciest inauguration ever. The 2nd plane went down while Obama’s government was busy fleecing America with a trillion dollar government spending spree disguised as a stimulus package. No matter how you slice it, 2 planes have crashed since the election of Mr. Obama.

If we were playing by the same rules as we did for George W. Bush, an impeachment would have been in the works already. Think about it – they wanted to impeach George Bush for going after terrorists. Imagine if he had not protected us from them? Imagine if President Bush tried to push through a trillion dollar pork filled bill in his first month as President, much less any other month. Imagine the conspiracy theories that would be in full swing involving these plane crashes.

One thing is for sure – the air hasn’t been very safe since Barack Obama’s election. What has this Administration done to make America safer? Perhaps we would be far better served with a National Security bill instead of a stimulus bill. The economy will come unraveled much quicker by a major terrorist attack than by our politicians not spending a trillion dollars and letting the economy heal without adding all their shameful pork.

Polls show that the stimulus/porkulus bill is going against the will of the people. Government officials themselves are admitting they will not have time to read the near 1,100 plus page bill. The combined incompetence and corruption is beyond anything America has ever seen. Did I mention it has only been a month since Barack Obama’s election?


George Strait Grammy Win Long Overdue

Monday, February 9th, 2009

Congratulations to George Strait on his long overdue Grammy Award, winning Best Country Album Award for “Troubadour.” I’m not sure if it is cause for celebration for the King of Country music, given the Grammy’s poor track record for giving out awards.

How does George Strait win his first award after nearly 30 years of astounding success in the music business? George Strait has amassed 56 number one singles – more than anyone in any genre ever. He has sold more than 67 million records and is at the top of any legitimate list of all-time performers, not only in Country music, but overall.

There are not many award shows that are worth much these days. They are a good showcase to see many of the top stars out there, but not a good barometer of who the people think are the very best performers. The humble George Strait is probably not nearly as insulted by the ridiculous slights the music legend has received as his fans are. He has always been low on hype and high on class, which basically goes against the grain of what most of these award shows like to reward.

The Grammy Awards finally recognizing George Strait is almost self-serving. They have no doubt gone out of their way to ignore him, but when all is said and done there could be no legitimacy to the show by shunning the entire career of King George. When it comes to music, whether you are a fan of County music or not, the top 3 all-time may well be Elvis Presley, The Beatles and George Strait. And George Strait is still going strong.


George Strait Live Performance of I Saw God Today:



Bill Gates Drawing Attention to Malaria or His Own Generosity?

Sunday, February 8th, 2009

I don’t know if Bill Gates is quite as bad as Oprah Winfrey yet, but his mosquito stunt seems to show a desire to draw attention to his own generosity, rather than a legitimate attempt to put an end to the malaria epidemic that has killed millions. The stunt that I speak of is where he let loose a bunch of mosquitoes into a crowd to make a point about malaria.

Just what was Bill Gates point? I don’t really know. He said that more money was spent on baldness drugs than malaria. That is sad, but probably true. Perhaps there was a more specific point, but I would think with all Bill Gates money and the money from his “foundation” that he would be capable of getting it out. As it stands it appears to be another swipe at the evil Americans who are letting poor people die. This, like when Oprah does it is coming from the richest of the rich. Not only that, but it seems profitable to be so publicly generous when you already have a name and product that everyone knows.

There apparently is something specific from the Gates Foundation. $1.4 billion has been promised to put into a vaccine that could reduce deaths by two-thirds, if it works. If it works? We already have a way to stop malaria and they are spending $1.4 billion for something that might work? How many poor people can you feed with $1.4 billion? Meanwhile, millions continue to die from malaria.

Perhaps Mr. Gates meant to mention that we once had malaria under control, but through politics DDT was banned paving the way for far more deaths than DDT ever had the potential to cause. I urge you to read the American Council on Science and Health story that was written way back in 2002. Think of the millions who died before and since - thanks to do-gooder politicians and their minions who care more about their power and a pat on the back than saving people. Here is an excerpt:

Now, thirty years later, it is vividly apparent that DDT was not hazardous to human health and that the banning of its domestic use led to its diminished production in the United States — and less availability of DDT for the developing world. The results were disastrous: at least 1-2 million people continue to die from malaria each year, 30-60 million or more lives needlessly lost since the ban took effect. This is especially tragic since there was hope of eradicating the disease altogether when DDT was first introduced and its potential was recognized.

The Environmental Defense Fund was an activist organization that pushed the DDT ban citing “health concerns.” Today such buzz words have evolved into other kind and gentle phrases, which mask the fact that millions are dying in the name of “health.” You know, buzz words like “reproductive health” and the like. They sound like they could only be good things. 

The EPA’s administrator, William Ruckelshausand received warnings from his own advisers as to what would happen if DDT was banned. Despite that, he and his fellow politicians went ahead in the name of “health concerns” and did it anyway. Perhaps there was a global scientific consensus that allowed him to ignore the warnings and good old common sense. Sound familiar?

I suppose Bill Gates may have meant to say that it was the kind of “sky is falling” global warming profiteers who caused the malaria problem in the first place. The same kind of save the world big government regulation types who allowed millions to die from malaria. Then again, Bill Gates has never seemed to have the courage to risk ruffling any real feathers and risking losing a real dollar in the process.

Bill Gates, who has been the target of liberals in Washington appears more willing to play the politics and profit game of generosity than actually trying to make a real difference. Possibly it keeps him from having to defend his success to liberals who frown on such entrepreneurial people. Maybe it is a shield that meant to protect against scrutiny for some monopolizing practices. Then again, it might just clear his conscience for having so much wealth by trying to convince people Oprah style that he is such a generous man.

I don’t like putting Bill Gates in the same boat as Oprah when it comes to the generosity game, but given his means to get a real message out there I find myself compelled to do so until I find out otherwise. We hear about big oil and their greed, but what about “big charity?” It is publicity money can’t buy for some. Maybe I can coin a phrase here and just call the profiting of generosity ”big Oprah.” Not to be confused with or the making fun of her fluctuating waistline.

It bothers me when rich people like Bill Gates and Oprah Winfrey, who live lifestyles that the average person cannot even conceive of try to make the little guy feel guilty for just living. You see hypocrites in Hollywood and politicians who talk a good game, yet do not practice what they preach. It is just for us peons to do as they say and not as they do. Does the following sound like any people out there today?

“As Jesus looked up, he saw the rich putting their gifts into the temple treasury. He also saw a poor widow put in her two mites. “Truly I tell you,” he said, “this poor widow has put in more than all the others. All these people gave their gifts out of their wealth; but she out of her poverty put in all she had to live on.” (Luke 21:1-4)

The moral of the Biblical story of the Widow’s mite is obvious. Today we have some who not only give purely out of their wealth, but seem to profit immensely from it. I am not ready to put Bill Gates into the elite class of political hypocrites who appear to put a couple hundred dollars in your pocket, while taking far more than that out of your other pocket - all the while getting praise from the sucker born every minute sheeple. Just like the politics of environmental and global warming extremism, the politics of charity is a shell game.

I will leave you with one more Biblical passage on the subject. You do not need to be a Christian to comprehend the principle of decency involved here. Are you listening Oprah?

“When you give to the poor, don’t be like the hypocrites. They blow trumpets in the synagogues and on the streets so that people will see them and honor them. I tell you the truth, those hypocrites already have their full reward.” (Matthew 6: 2)


——————

Get the News that Matters at eNewsAlerts.com